Spinning the Data? Thinking Critically about Maps

By Natalie Gibb, Heritage College

Spinning the Data? Thinking Critically about Maps

At a Glance

Discipline

  • Geography
  • Environmental science

Instructional Level

  • College & CEGEP

Course

  • People, Places, Environments: Introduction to Geography

Tasks in Workflow

Social Plane(s)

  • Individual
  • Group

Type of Tasks

  • Solving problems
  • Analyzing

Technical Details

Class size

  • Very small (< 20)
  • Small (20-49)

Time

  • Single class period (< 90 mins)

Inclusivity & Accessibility

  • Variety of representations

Instructional Purpose

  • Application & knowledge building
  • Preparation & knowledge activation

Overview

This problem-based learning activity introduces students to choropleth mapping while encouraging them to question the common assumption that maps are objective. Students explore how mapmakers’ choices can guide readers toward particular conclusions.

Students work through a case study in which they take on the role of a summer intern at an environmental organization. Using data on greenhouse gas emissions in Canada, they are asked to create a map the organization could use to support a funding request for climate change mitigation projects.

The case study challenges students to produce two different maps. In the first, they use the tertile approach to organise the data; in the second, they use the equal-size interval approach. They then decide which map is more effective for the grant application and justify their choice.

This activity is designed as an introduction to mapping at the beginning of the semester, before students start using GIS.

Tips:

  • Before the activity begins, spend a few minutes discussing colour choices in maps. Show students two examples: a categorical colour scheme and a light‑to‑dark colour ramp. Ask them which scheme would be more appropriate for showing provinces with low, medium, and high greenhouse gas emissions, and why.
  • This activity is easy to adapt to other topics that may be more engaging for students or better aligned with the course (e.g., physical activity levels, mental health, income inequality). To adapt it, simply replace the greenhouse gas emissions data with data on another topic.
  • In addition this activity can be adapted to focus on other mapping decisions: for example, using global data and asking students to choose a map projection (such as Mercator, polar, or equal-area) that best supports their argument.

Topics: Mapping, Climate Action

Check out the workflow below to review the activity sequence.

Instructional Objectives

By the end of this activity, students will be able to:

  • Explain what a choropleth map is and what it’s used for
  • Create choropleth maps using different data classification methods (tertiles and equal-size intervals)
  • Explain, using examples, why maps are not objective sources of information and how they can be used to influence how people think
  • Justify the choice of one map over another based on its effectiveness for a specific audience and purpose”

Workflow & Materials

Workflow

Activity Workflow

View on CourseFlow

Contributor's Notes

Natalie Gibb

Natalie Gibb

SALTISE Fellow, Heritage College, Gatineau

Benefits
Challenges
Benefits
  • Creating two different maps from the same data helps students recognize how mapmakers’ decisions affect how information is interpreted, reinforcing the idea that maps are not objective sources of information.
Challenges
  • Some students may find the math required to create equal‑interval maps challenging. To support them, have students work in small groups where they can talk through the calculations, even though each student completes their own worksheet.

Applied Strategies